Donald Trump, Dennis Hastert, Mark Foley, Jim Jordan--all republican groomers

It is somewhat ironic that, when presented with what appears to be a real story of a child rape, the party that spent part of this year fanning a panic about "groomers" decided that it must have been fake news.

— Jordan Weissmann (@JHWeissmann) July 13, 2022

Republican = Traitor

Peace,

emaycee

 

The Pedophile Party

Hello and welcome to America in 2022, where Republican politicians _really_ want to look at children’s privates. For reasons. https://t.co/bp9UezYcdH

— Greg Greene (@ggreeneva) February 17, 2022

Republican = Racist

Peace,

emaycee

 

Another float in the pervert parade

Prisoners don't take kindly to pedophiles

 In completely unsurprising news, republican U.S. representative Matt Gaetz is under investigation for allegedly having sexual relation with a seventeen year old, and for transporting her across state lines for illicit purposes.

Gaetz joins such republican pervert luminaries as Roy Moore (lost Senate election because of his predilection for young girls), Jim Jordan (stood by while the athletes he coached were molested--for what it's worth, he believes Matt Gaetz when he says he's innocent), Dennis Hastert (went to prison for molesting boys he coached), and their beloved Donald Trump (who walked in on a young girls' dressing room in a beauty pageant of his--and God only knows what Jeffrey Epstein knew before he was killed commited suicide).  For all the QAnon nonsense about pedophiles running the world, you'd think they'd have figured out by now that pedophiles are running the republican party.

By the way, how long do you suppose before republicans forget all about how they said Bill Clinton shouldn't have taken advantage of twenty-four year old Monica Lewinskey, and start their defense of Gaetz by saying that a seventeen year old isn't all that young and plenty of young girls look strikingly like adults?

400,000 Needless Deaths Because the Pro-Life Party Botched the Pandemic

Peace,

emaycee

On Rachel Dolezal

There are people who are much smarter than I am when it comes to what effects the Rachel Dolezal saga will have on the NAACP and the African-American community, and what it means to African-American women.  I am not an expert on the transracial aspects of her story and couldn't begin to explain her psychological motivations, either pro or con.

But I will say this:  while it's fair politics to to have snarky comments when the opposing party has an embarrassing episode involving one of its supporting organizations, you should at least have the brains to do it for the right reasons.  The Rachel Dolezal episode is a black eye for the NAACP, but it is not indicative of Liberals, does not have anything to do with political correctness, and I will flat fucking guarantee you that this country's Civil Rights pioneers are not rolling over in their graves concerning it, despite Sarah Palin's wildest dreams..  It is no more an indictment of the Democratic Party than Denny Hastert's child molestation allegations are an indictment of the republican party (unless it proven that the powers that be in the republican party were aware of such allegations).

Besides, at least when we screw up it's in the name of helping others--unlike conservatism, it is not a core principle of Liberalism to fuck over the American people whenever the opportunity arises.

Peace,
emaycee